23 January 2014

In Which I Wade into the Nigerian Anti-Gay Law Debate

Nigeria has made herself the enemy of the West by banning same-sex marriage, same-sex unions and same-sex associations, with law-breakers facing 14 years in jail.

CNN (International) - Nigeria's premier news channel broadcasting on every, and I mean every, flat screen TV in every bank, shop, office and public area in Abuja 24/7- is particularly pissed about it.
I noticed how much CNN had been pushing the pro-gay agenda prior to this law. One report I remember was when famously gay singer Elton John and famously gay tennis star Billie Jean King spoke to Christianne Amanpour about the recent brouhaha over Russia's anti-gay stance during the Winter Olympics this year.
Will there ever by a Gay Marriage in Nigeria?
And of course CNN's Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon are gay (and Becky Anderson maybe? I always though she was gay. I like to think my gay-dar is strong.) I'm pretty sure they and probably the gay/lesbian CNN producers make sure to highlight injustices against homosexuals around the world and promote gay rights advances wherever it occurs.
Western movies, TV shows and music have also being promoting homosexuality as a 'normal thing,' with gay dads and their adopted daughter on comedy Modern Family and almost every other student coming out as gay in high school musical comedy Glee.
So when Nigeria's President Goodluck Jonathan came riding rough-shod over the Western media’s delicately-handled ‘Operation re-educate the world about homosexuality’ PR exercise, by passing the 'anti-gay' bill into law earlier this month, the West was livid. They threatened to withhold their aid, spoke strongly against the law calling it a violation of human rights, and Canada even cancelled Jonathan's visit to the country in protest.
CNN led the charge against Nigeria. I'm sure the channel is aware of its huge following here as the most watched and most trusted news station in the country, way ahead of the supposed national news channel NTA, which nobody watches, including me, because the picture quality and sound harkens back to the 1970s and the content is drab and mostly government-sponsored.
Nigerians also invest a huge amount to advertise on CNN International. You would think it was a national station the way Nigerian-sponsored adverts for mobile phone networks like Glo, MTN and Etisalat ,and random door and furniture stores advertise heavily on the station, and I hear these ads are not cheap. The CNN (International ) we watch here is also shown in the UK and other English-speaking African countries (America has its own version), but 50% of the adverts are Nigerian.

Plus almost every other personality on the channel's African Voices is Nigerian. Talk about dominance!
So CNN used its popularity in the country to make a point and ran extended news features decrying Nigeria's latest law, with breathlessly apoplectic journalists reporting from Lagos on the various gay-rights abuses they'd heard about. Christianne Amanpour even interviewed Bisi Alimi, the first man to come out on national TV in Nigeria, following which he had to seek asylum in Britain. He spoke passionately and eloquently on the issue; if I was gay I would have been so proud of him as the spokesman for Nigerian gays.
Bisi Alimi, Nigeria's first man to declare himself gay on TV, on CNN a few days ago
As the debates rage on, if you’re in Nigeria you’re in one of these four camps: 
1. Gays and Gay-lovers: Yes! At last, the gays and lesbians have a voice! Roll on happy gay marriages across the nation and civil rights for gay people everywhere! Today debates, tomorrow full acceptance, maybe even a gay President!

2. The Homophobic Majority: God bless Jonathan for putting those nasty gays in their place! If I catch any of those dirty men ehn, I will...Hmm. Imagine leaving the luscious beauty of a woman and handling the nether regions of my fellow man? Tufiakwa! Abeg, if they even dare to protest I will be the first in line to beat those men-chasers. Imagine!
3. The Ignorant Minority: Wait, there are gay people in Nigeria? Since when? I thought it was only a white man’s disease. Wonders shall never end...
4. The Casual Observers: Wow, all this talk about gayness. I don’t really care if they want to bum each other, that’s their prerogative. They want to marry too? Umm, OK, but just NIMBY (Not in my back yard) please.
The emerging voices of Group 1 loudly drowned out by the distaste of Group 2 has taken over the airwaves, with nary a voice from Group 4 even acknowledged.

Group 3 were previously in the dark about matters of same-sex relationships thanks to the culture of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ prevalent in Nigeria, and only came across images of homosexuality on Western TV, hence its association with white people. (Which is naive of course, because there have always been homosexuals all across Nigeria - I hear the North plays a major role in this scene too - and it's an open secret that some top politicians are men who like to sleep with other men for homosexual/political/spiritual/financial reasons *cough cough*)
I am firmly in Group 4, whereby I am distinctly nonchalant about the whole discussion. As a non-homosexual with no ties to homosexuals and a balanced view of the Bible, I am blasé about the issue.
I’ve had friends that were gay, and I've read testimonials written by secretly gay Christians who are completely tortured by their desire for the same sex and have prayed, fasted and had counselling to dispel it, some even married and had children, but still they can’t shake it off. If they could take a pill and become heterosexual tomorrow, they would do it in an instant. They often question God in tears asking him why He would inflict them with such a reprehensible affliction.
So I’m sympathetic to their plight, and the desire for those who are happy to be gay to live without discrimination. But I'm concerned about their growing confidence and demand for not only acceptance, but full immersion into the mainstream and for their lifestyle to be accepted as alternative rather than deviant.
Lawmakers used the law to say: “No thanks. The West can legalise homosexuality and go to hell in a hand-basket if it wants, but as for we Nigerians and our country, we will serve the Lord (and punish those homos with their anal activities).”


Africans in general are vehemently anti-gay. It's in their blood. The African man that is pro-gay has either spent some time abroad, is well-read and well-versed in Western culture, or is gay himself (much to his own initial horror and shame probably.) But there are also men who tick all three boxes but who remain outwardly homophobic and inwardly tormented.


Then there are small pockets of Nigerian intellectuals and free-thinkers who argue for the rights of homosexuals in their small enclaves of enlightenment. They have been vocal on Twitter and I've also conversed with a few. They are the well-read, often (but not always) foreign-educated young idealists who are embarrassed by the hate spewed against homosexuals by their fellow countrymen, and often regard such homophobes as inadequately-educated religious zealots.

But Jesus never said a thing about homosexuals. Not one thing. He spoke against greed, pride, the love of money and adultery (all of which occur in spades in Nigeria and around the world), but not a jot about gays, which leads me to believe that in heaven's assessment of sin, homosexuality is not number one. Besides, it was pride that got Satan thrown out of heaven, not homosexuality.

But I do believe that being gay is an unnatural aspect of humanity; a glitch in the matrix, a defect in nature. I compared being born gay to being born without an arm once, and somebody took offence. All humans need eyes and all men and women were given sex organs that compliment each other to enable procreation and pleasure; some are born without eyes, and some are born gay.

To put it in another (more crude) way, if all was well with homosexuality sexually-speaking, why would gay men still need 'a hole' and lesbians an 'artificial penis' to satisfy? The normal way works best after all right?
Though some that are born gay (there are children as young as nine who tell their parents they're gay, and gay adults say they've been aware of their sexual orientation for as long as they can remember), but others become gay following homosexual abuse by the same sex in their childhood. I also believe there is a spirit of homosexuality that can rest on some families, i.e. the issue of the man who has three daughters and two of them are lesbians. I was like, wow, in one family? That's got to be a spiritual thing.
So I have a little understanding of the plight of gay people but a distaste for their demands. They are not normal in the full sense of the word, and no I would not want my child to be gay, simply because I wish for my children success, marriage, family and normalcy. And I want grandchildren the old-fashioned way. I don't want my child to be different all their lives or to be ashamed to face God because they feel innately inadequate.
What I don't have is hate for gay people. Why should I hate them simply because they are gay? I've known some lovely gay people, and they are often highly intelligent and hugely hilarious. What they do in their house is their business, but I don't want them to push their agenda or force me to accept their lifestyle as good and pleasing, because I believe it's still wrong to mate with your fellow sex. It's not normal. But if you're gay, it's absolutely fine with me. 

A gay acquaintance and I once quite happily co-existed in a plain of mutual unspoken disapproval about something hugely important to us: he disapproved of my faith, and I of his homosexuality. As long as we didn't go there we got on just fine. I would, for instance, watch a Gay Rights march with some interest, but not join in or cheer. But if one of the marchers got hurt in any ensuing violence, I would call for help and tend to them. I don't support what they do but I support their right to live, work and be.
And I believe there are Nigerians out there who are also viewing these hot debates with a pinch of salt. The world will not end if gays got married, but we don’t want to see them canoodling in the back-row at the cinemas either. The law has come, good, if it is repealed tomorrow, fine.

Recently I had dinner with a group of ex-pats and other returnees to Nigeria, and one of the women, upon hearing I was Fulani, asked me if the Fulani men she's seen dressed flamboyantly in tight, colourful tops and trousers, with their thin waists, long hair, pretty eyes enhanced with eyeliner and delicate ways are gay. I remember asking the same question myself when I came across a group of similarly-dandified Fulani young men. I am told they're not gay, they just like to dress that way. Fine. Odd, but fine.

They are also not, as far as I know, yan daudus, which are effeminate men from the North who dress like women and are mostly gay. No, this class of Fulani men just like to dress prettily, that's all.

So as a card-carrying member of the Casual Observers Group, I declare that nobody should be lynched or beaten or insulted or discriminated against for being gay, but homosexuals should also temper their demand for acceptance with sensitivity: not everyone likes what you do, so if you must, do it quietly and don’t make a scene.
That is all.

9 comments:

  1. Hmmm...Topic well tackled..
    I'm also a member of 'group 4'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let me just point out where you are wrong, as a Nigerian woman who happens to be a woman-loving-woman (I don't call myself a lesbian well except when I'm in the UK where less people are familiar with WLW).

    1. Gays and Gay-lovers: Yes! At last, the gays and lesbians have a voice! Roll on happy gay marriages across the nation and civil rights for gay people everywhere! Today debates, tomorrow full acceptance, maybe even a gay President!

    And you claim to have had gay friends? Was this in Nigeria? Because I'm sure that the gays in Nigeria are not looking for marriage. Marriage is the least of their problems! They are more worried about their safety, health and family. Which gay Nigerian would think of a gay president when there are hasn't even been a woman president?

    Africans in general are vehemently anti-gay. It's in their blood.

    So does this include the Africans that are gay? Or are you going to ignore that these vehemently anti-gay sentiments are relatively "new" thanks to things like Victorian England and colonialism?

    But I believe that being gay is an unnatural aspect of humanity; a glitch in the matrix, a defect in nature.

    You're entitled to this belief but I wonder how nature fits in all this? Like I hate to bring in the animal kingdom (because gay people shouldn't be compared to animals to prove a point!) but is the homosexuality that happens with animals such as monkeys, penguins, a defect in nature as well?

    What I don't have is hate for gay people.

    But you definitely come across as virulently homophobic. And I'm surprised you don't realise how strange it is to say that being gay is a defect in nature...but go on to say that you don't hate them. Do you realise how hateful it is to be told that you're defective in nature because of who you're attracted to/sleep with? To go on and say "homosexuals should also temper their demand for acceptance with sensitivity", excuse me all these people are asking for is the right to bleeping live without fear of being thrown in jail, lynched, publicly humiliated, beaten up, raped, disowned by their families. Is this really too much to ask? And from people who claim to be filled with love for their fellow human being? What must gay people do quietly? Who ever got their rights by sitting back quietly and not making a scene? People like you back in the day would have told us to protest quietly rather than protesting slavery and colonialism.

    It's a damn shame. I recently came across your blog and this is the first post you've put up since I subscribed. I must say I'm disappointed. And btw I don't want to see straight people kissing and holding themselves in public either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, I am with you. After all, left-handedness cannot be described as a "defect in nature", can it?

      Overall, although the post is obviously well-intended, it comes across to those of us who are directly affected by same-gender-attraction, as being rather patronising.

      Delete
  3. Hi Anonymous, let me respond to your response one by one:

    1. I've had gay friends, we weren't very close, but we were friends in the past in England, not Nigeria, and one said he would love to get married one day. Even in Nigeria I'm sure many homosexuals dream of one day being able to marry the one they love no? (There's also a little humour in that sentence too...)

    2. I mentioned in the post that Africans are homophobic, *except* those who spent time abroad, are well-read or are gay themselves.

    Also the default position in the majority of societies in the past (due to religion and societal norms) was anti-gay, and even up until a couple of decades ago. Homosexuals themselves expected homophobia. It is the vilification of homophobia by the mainstream that is new.

    3. Yes, most definitely homosexual animals are a defect in nature. I firmly believe that. If the vast majority of the population of something is red and it works, the few that are blue and it doesn't work would be considered defects. I'm sure you've heard it said before that if all humanity was gay we would be doomed. That's why homosexuals are a minority, because it's against the natural order of things.

    4. It's a tad overblown to call me virulently homophobic, I'm certainly not pro-gay yes, but I'm not totally anti-gay, as I've detailed in the piece. There's only so much understanding and approval a non-gay person can have for the homosexual cause when they are not personally affected by it.

    As I said, I am blasé about gay rights. I am not offering support for gays nor condemnation, just acknowledgment and friendship.

    If that's not enough, fine.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love your site, and nod my head at everything. Only speaking up here where I disagree. Assuming that heterosexual is normal is easy because it is the majority. Did you know that the first life on earth was asexual, that there were no men? The ocean itself was a womb, providing nutrients like amniotic fluid. Parthenogenesis, or Virgin birth, was the rule, not the exception. There was no need for a penis or even a uterus. The placenta came 150 million years ago, the Late Jurassic period. Land animals did not need penis' either. Komodo dragons use parthenogenesis, too. It was the age of reptiles that the penis evolved that would later become the human penis. The womb went from inside a body of water to inside of a woman's body.

    What I am getting at is that your logic is insufficient. By your logic, homosexuality has no purpose because it is abnormal. When penises and placenta were the minority, did that mean they did not have a purpose? What else is abnormal in life? yan daudus, but they found a purpose, no? Many species exist in symbiotic relationships: little fish clean the teeth of big fish and in exchange they have something to eat. Straight people have an adoption crisis and gay men and women are there to adopt. In some species of birds, "nearly one-fifth of all long-term greylag geese couples are gay, composed of two males." They raise young together, but seem more concerned with enjoying one another's company rather than having all the babies in the world. Perhaps their purpose is to maximize companionship. All of these things are a mystery which people in Group 1 *embrace as a mystery*, but you judge as "wrong."

    No one is trying to force their lifestyle on you; they just want to be able to enjoy the same privileges and rights as you. So you are allowed to canoodle in the back of a movie theater with a man, but a gay couple cannot? How cruel is it to say they cannot participate in the same courtship rituals which society promises every eager young human with desire for eros? All we want is full participation in society; not to be special. The more we feel repressed, the more we will want to make a scene, because repression leads to need for catharsis. Telling us to be quiet is to tell us to be good little homosexuals and to know our place, which is bound to get you the exact opposite. Human nature.

    Gay men on TV are stereotypes fulfilling demands by straight people; our lives are a lot less flamboyant than that- the same way that white America demands their Black people to be thugs and flamboyant entertainers like Chris Tucker. We really are no different because we have the same strivings as anyone; so TV could stand to reflect that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. (part 2/2) Being gay was never a choice for me. I used to wish I could make it go away, but it made me more sensitive to discrimination, which led me down a path of social justice, so now I am a prominent activist, anti-racist, and social worker in my community. I only wanted it to go away because I didn't recognize it as a gift; the same way I wanted my curly hair to go away, until I saw the beauty in it. I heard about a Black boy who one day when he went to a barbershop realized he was not white, and he cried. There are wrong reasons to see something you're born with as a scourge and wish it could go away- internalized homophobia is one of them.

    I found my purpose- my boyfriend- we make each other very happy and help each other grow intellectually, spiritually, morally, and inspire each other. We were meant for each other, just like those geese- to spend a good deal of time in companionship and raise a couple of children while we are at it. I found my purpose- my womanly mind helps me have therapy sessions with my clients. I found my purpose- a heightened sensitivity to questioning authority, tradition, alienation, and oppression.

    You have the privilege to be able to be blase. I don't have that privilege; I will have to fight all my life to get my fair share of what's mine- full participation in society. I am afraid of violence so I often refrain hold my boyfriend's hand when I walk down the street. Blase straight people can't act like inaction is not a form of complicity in injustice.

    "I would not want my child to be gay, simply because I wish for my children success, marriage, family and normalcy." Well, gay people can be very successful. Many of us have families. When I drive home from work after a fulfilling day, knowing I am about to cook dinner with my love, I feel a sense of normalcy.
    What is not normal is having to defend sexual nature with a complete stranger over the internet at 3 in the morning because I want to feel accepted so desperately by a smart, worldly person like you with whom I identify.

    If everyone in the world learned sign language from pre-school on up, deaf people would no longer be disabled. If everyone treated gay people without double standards and helped them have equal privileges, then being gay would no longer be an issue. If you really don't care what gay people do, then help us make it not an issue by giving us equal rights.
    If you really do care what gay people do in the back of a theater, because it makes you itch like seeing a developmentally disabled person moan, just remember that like the famous autistic person Temple Grandin, whose autism helped her solve animal cruelty problems no one even knew existed, homosexuals may have a gift to share with the world after all, and it is best to not pretend you know "the order of nature."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Shep, thanks for taking the time out to write your comments (at 3am!) I appreciate the thought and feeling that went into it.

    OK so firstly, I don't believe in evolution. The idea of the self-generation of a spirit, soul and intellect totally devoid of an intelligent designer is foolishness to me, so I'm a believer in God creating life. That's a whole nother discussion of course, but as a basis for this argument, it doesn't work with me. (E.g. before the penis evolved, however millions of years that took, was the vagina evolving at the same speed? Or did one evolve and wait for the other? And what of the uterus, breasts etc, was there a long period of no procreation until our bodies evolved the necessary components for making, incubating and feeding a life? Why is believing in God the non-intellectual option, when it takes more faith than intellect to believe this whole world evolved from nothing?)

    "So you are allowed to canoodle in the back of a movie theater with a man, but a gay couple cannot?" I didn't say a gay couple cannot, if they want to go ahead, I just don't want to see it, so I'll probably just move away. To be honest, a straight couple kissing in public in front of me is not my fave scene either, it's a private activity and it makes me uncomfortable, and a gay couple even more so.

    "If you really don't care what gay people do, then help us make it not an issue by giving us equal rights" Like I said, if Nigeria and the world gave gay people all the rights in the world, I would have no problem with that. I'm not against your progress or the enjoyment of your humanity, and I'm not in support of your discrimination.

    I also absolutely believe that gay people can be talented, successful etc, they are people after all, homosexuality doesn't define or limit them in any way, why should it? But who they choose to mate with is simply at odds with nature, in my mind, thus this should be flagged up and not encouraged. But since homosexuality can't be stopped or reversed, it's all good. But I won't support it as normal or desirable.

    I get it that this is not a popular opinion amongst the supposedly enlightened, but hey, this is my blog, so thankfully I'm free to air my views without feeling afraid of bucking the trend.

    "If everyone treated gay people without double standards and helped them have equal privileges, then being gay would no longer be an issue" It might lead to gay people facing no more discrimination, which would be fantastic, but it will still be an issue with people who believe man + man or woman + woman is not the way humans were meant to mate, in the original scheme of things. Procreation is vital, which is why homosexuals are the minority. We were all born with the tools to procreate, which implies that this was our original purpose, and those that nature makes unable to do so are off-track.

    "I am afraid of violence so I often refrain hold my boyfriend's hand when I walk down the street" This is sad. Having to refrain from expressing your affection for the one you love for fear of attack is awful, I can't imagine it. Sorry to hear this. I'm happy you found someone you can share your life with in peace, good for you. I have no problem with that. I wish you all the best in the world. You'll probably make better parents than many heterosexuals (yet this just doesn't sit well with me, no matter how wonderful Modern Family makes it look)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2/2
      "Having to defend sexual nature with a complete stranger over the internet at 3 in the morning because I want to feel accepted so desperately by a smart, worldly person like you with whom I identify" sigh. This makes me feel bad. I didn't mean to make you feel less than at all. This are purely my views, and if I knew you, I would express them, we would argue, maybe not speak to each other for a few days to cool off, then we'll continue a friendship, agreeing to disagree. Unless you cannot fathom knowing a homophobe (a term charged with negativity, but in this instance meaning someone who doesn't support the facts of your lifestyle).

      I don't hate you or people like you at all. And I know you can't suppress it. But I cannot deny that my instincts, thoughts and perceptions deem homosexually as wrong and unnatural. I cannot. I feel the need to apologise for my views, except that I shouldn't have to. Because me thinking this way doesn't stop you, and you being yourself doesn't stop me, so on we go. I have no answers, only thoughts.

      It is well Shep.

      Delete